<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.huggin.net/blog/2003/08/20/cipa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2003/08/20/cipa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2003/08/20/cipa/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2003 03:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comments on CIPA, and I'd like to add some.  The InfoPeople project &lt;a href="http://www.infopeople.org/howto/filtering/"&gt;did a filtering comparison&lt;/a&gt; which showed that filters vary in usability, effectiveness, etc.  My biggest gripe about the filters, is I think it forces libraries to buy an ineffective product, and provides an empty promise to citizens: we have filters, therefore your kids are safe alone at the library.  I can't even begin to address everything that's wrong with that!  Having been a little pseudo-hacker myself in my younger years, installing filters just sets up a challenge.  Where before patrons might not have accessed porn because they were busy entering contests &#38; playing Runescape, now there's a challenge: get around the filter.  And it's extremely easy to do, check out the useful instructions at &lt;a href="http://www.peacefire.org/"&gt;PeaceFire&lt;/a&gt;.  It's another case of politics being overtaken by cynical individuals who are easily influenced by a few weathly contributors and make legislation without really understanding the details of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comments on CIPA, and I&#8217;d like to add some.  The InfoPeople project <a href="http://www.infopeople.org/howto/filtering/">did a filtering comparison</a> which showed that filters vary in usability, effectiveness, etc.  My biggest gripe about the filters, is I think it forces libraries to buy an ineffective product, and provides an empty promise to citizens: we have filters, therefore your kids are safe alone at the library.  I can&#8217;t even begin to address everything that&#8217;s wrong with that!  Having been a little pseudo-hacker myself in my younger years, installing filters just sets up a challenge.  Where before patrons might not have accessed porn because they were busy entering contests &amp; playing Runescape, now there&#8217;s a challenge: get around the filter.  And it&#8217;s extremely easy to do, check out the useful instructions at <a href="http://www.peacefire.org/">PeaceFire</a>.  It&#8217;s another case of politics being overtaken by cynical individuals who are easily influenced by a few weathly contributors and make legislation without really understanding the details of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
