<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carleen and Mike &#187; 2005 &#187; January &#187; 24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.huggin.net/blog/2005/01/24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog</link>
	<description>raising loki in okie land</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Opera</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2005/01/24/opera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2005/01/24/opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been working on several websites recently and so I downloaded some new browsers this past weekend, one if which being Opera. While I still had a working Windows machine in the house I used Opera almost exclusively on that machine - I loved Opera - it&#8217;s also one of the more &#8220;web compliant&#8221; browsers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working on several websites recently and so I downloaded some new browsers this past weekend, one if which being <a href="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a>. While I still had a working Windows machine in the house I used Opera almost exclusively on that machine - I loved Opera - it&#8217;s also one of the more &#8220;web compliant&#8221; browsers out there (from what I&#8217;ve been told). However, after downloading the Mac version (and seeing some of the updates they&#8217;ve made to it) it&#8217;s sad to say I&#8217;m extremely disappointed. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve added a large banner at the top of the screen that post advertisements, unless you buy the full version for around $40US. Now I&#8217;m all about simplicity. I&#8217;m a huge Safari (Mac OS X browser) fan. Safari gives you probably the most Browser &#8220;real estate&#8221; of any browser I&#8217;ve used yet. I like my space. Having a giant advertisement at the top of my screen invades my space. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve also added a &#8220;Search Amazon&#8221; feature and a &#8220;Price Comparison&#8221; feature. The former takes you directly to your search results at Amazon, the latter, to a site called &#8220;DealTime&#8221;. If I want to search Amazon, I&#8217;ll go to Amazon. If want to compare prices, I&#8217;ll go to <a href="http://www.froogle.com/">Froogle</a>. Don&#8217;t take away my space. </p>
<p>Another area that Safari blows the competition out of the water is its speed. Every time I open any other browser I get the dreaded &#8220;spinny wheel&#8221; (&#8221;hourglass&#8221; to you PC users) and wait while the program loads. Not so with Safari. </p>
<p>Anyway, the point of this blog was not to completly trash Opera or raise Safari on a pedestle (it has its own faults too), but I simply wish that Opera would keep it simple, stay standards compliant (we need more browsers like that out there) and most importantly take users away from their Internet Explorer boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2005/01/24/opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
