<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carleen and Mike &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.huggin.net/blog/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Photo of the Week: Week 5</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/21/photo-of-the-week-week-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/21/photo-of-the-week-week-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA["photo of the week"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew I couldn&#8217;t keep a schedule. At least I know not to work for a newspaper. This week&#8217;s photo&#8217;s are pretty much about me just trying to get something posted this week having fun in front of the camera. Self-Portraits. I did have fun with these, as I tend to do once I get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I couldn&#8217;t keep a schedule. At least I know not to work for a newspaper. This week&#8217;s photo&#8217;s are pretty much about me just <strike>trying to get something posted this week</strike> having fun in front of the camera. Self-Portraits. I did have fun with these, as I tend to do once I get an idea and start messing around with it. No attempt at decent quality - it&#8217;s all on-camera flash, pointed straight at my face in the middle of the night. It&#8217;s neat to see how my expressions changed from what I <em>wanted</em> them to be to what they become after the pre-flash burned out my retinas. </p>
<p>I was pointed to a great website: <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/03/lighting-101.html">Strobist</a> by my friend Josh recently, as such, I&#8217;m looking to pick up a decent flash unit and and try some studio work. I&#8217;m looking at a Vivitar 285HV. It&#8217;s a workhorse, a powerful flash, and almost totally manual, which is all that I&#8217;ll need once I can get the flash off the camera (tripods, cords/Pocket Wizards, umbrellas - $$). Anyway, hopefully within a few months you&#8217;ll be seeing some studio style shots from me - I&#8217;m looking forward to it! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2689194156/" title="IMG_2640 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3273/2689194156_a9cbd79d9e.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2640" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2688363737/" title="IMG_2625 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/2688363737_df521f6b51.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2625" /></a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember what I was trying to show in the above shot - but I got this from a long series of pre-flashes as the camera tried to get focus and evaluate the scene. Flash in your face + night time = seriously burned retinas. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2689197548/" title="IMG_2643 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3018/2689197548_fb0cd8717d.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2643" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2689188374/" title="IMG_2637 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/2689188374_a7a39ef0f4.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2637" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2688369621/" title="IMG_2633 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2220/2688369621_1390c801bf.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2633" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2689179710/" title="IMG_2631 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3115/2689179710_24457cbf97.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2631" /></a></p>
<p>You can tell I had fun, and that was the point. </p>
<p>Note: the next Photo of the Week will probably be coming to you from my parents computer in NY, as we&#8217;re going up for a visit at the end of this week. It&#8217;ll be nice to get a change of scenery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/21/photo-of-the-week-week-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo of the Week: Week 4</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/08/photo-of-the-week-week-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/08/photo-of-the-week-week-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry folks, I&#8217;ve missed the past 2 weeks of PotW - the first week I needed to get the bathroom done in a hurry for the 4th of July, which put PotW on hold for the next week. Also, you&#8217;ll notice I&#8217;m early - I&#8217;m hoping to get downtown so as to shoot things that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry folks, I&#8217;ve missed the past 2 weeks of PotW - the first week I needed to get the bathroom done in a hurry for the 4th of July, which put PotW on hold for the next week. Also, you&#8217;ll notice I&#8217;m early - I&#8217;m hoping to get downtown so as to shoot things that <em>aren&#8217;t</em> in my backyard, but not sure if I&#8217;m going to get down there. If so, you&#8217;ll get a bonus PotW this Friday. But we&#8217;re back with an extra special HUGE PotW to make amends - this weeks set is a theme: Decay. I&#8217;m working on a self-portrait set, but I&#8217;m having trouble deciding what exactly I want to say with that one - generally if I don&#8217;t make self-portraits that are me hamming in front of the camera, they end up being all emo and dark. I&#8217;m not a model (you know what I mean?). </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2650141941/" title="IMG_2564 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3141/2650141941_387d3f2e45.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2564" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2650141299/" title="IMG_2559 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3222/2650141299_12ec1301f5.jpg" width="500" height="329" alt="IMG_2559" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2650140271/" title="IMG_2548 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3293/2650140271_b83a0d6889.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2548" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2650139323/" title="IMG_2544 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/2650139323_2ae514d745.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_2544" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carleenandmike/2650138553/" title="IMG_2540 by carleenandmike, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3027/2650138553_e5c6fb4888.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="IMG_2540" /></a></p>
<p>I love &#8220;old stuff&#8221; like this. I really like old barns filled with lots of rusty farm machinery. I should be able to find one of those around here if I try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2008/07/08/photo-of-the-week-week-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scanning Pics</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/10/22/scanning-pics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/10/22/scanning-pics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/10/22/scanning-pics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been slowly working on scanning our Honeymoon pics from Norway. The project was going along quite well until I opened what I have scanned in Photoshop tonight to start doing some tweaking. Everything - every one of the 40+ pics I had scanned, straight from negatives, was blurry. Remember, I have a B.F.A. in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been slowly working on scanning our Honeymoon pics from Norway. The project was going along quite well until I opened what I have scanned in Photoshop tonight to start doing some tweaking. Everything - every one of the 40+ pics I had scanned, straight from negatives, was blurry. Remember, I have a B.F.A. in Photography, and was using a Nikon camera (arguably some of the finest lenses out there). So I&#8217;m guessing my scanner is what&#8217;s turning my beautiful pics into garbage. Which isn&#8217;t surprising since it&#8217;s a 3-in-1 scanner, copier, printer. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to get access to a really high quality film scanner so I could get my entire portfolio saved digitally. I&#8217;d hate to buy something like that, since after I had all my old photo&#8217;s scanned it would be pretty useless. Meanwhile, I&#8217;m a bit frustrated with my new digital camera, a Canon Digital Rebel XT - but it&#8217;s only a minor frustration. It takes really sharp pictures and there&#8217;s plenty of manual control, which I absolutely demand out of a camera. My one pet peeve is 2 things that are inter-related so I&#8217;ll only count them as one: under low light it has a very hard time focusing. But I&#8217;m not talking darkness, I mean subdued light; maybe overcast skies; and the sensor does not seem to be as sensitive to light as I would like. In a room where an ISO 400 should handle the job, it&#8217;s telling me I need to use ISO 800. </p>
<p>This could be my lens - in fact, both these problems could be the lens that comes with the camera. I&#8217;m going to have to eventually invest in a straight 50mm lens. I&#8217;ve been using zoom lenses for years now on both my film camera and now the digital, and I have never been terribly happy with the quality - they tend to be a bit on the fuzzy side. </p>
<p>Anywho - click on our Flickr Badge (below, right) to see the new (old) pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/10/22/scanning-pics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belly in Mirror</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/04/01/334/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/04/01/334/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carleen Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/04/01/334/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objects in mirror are not as large as they appear&#8230;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objects in mirror are not as large as they appear&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.huggin.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/belly.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2006/04/01/334/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>web site update</title>
		<link>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2004/03/13/web-site-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2004/03/13/web-site-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huxley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huggin.net/blog/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My brand spankin&#8217; new web page is finally up! Though not complete, I have uploaded several of my still-life and portrait photographs. Anyone who had my old site bookmarked should update their bookmarks, as I had to change my hosting company, and now have my very own domain name. You can get to it by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My brand spankin&#8217; new web page is finally up! Though not complete, I have uploaded several of my still-life and portrait photographs. Anyone who had my old site bookmarked should update their bookmarks, as I had to change my hosting company, and now have my very own domain name. You can get to it by following the link that says &#8220;mike&#8217;s photography&#8221; in the menu at the right. Any updates to the site itself will be posted here on this blog, since I didn&#8217;t want to clutter my photo page with updates, which probably won&#8217;t be happening too often after I get it up and running. But keep checking back over the next few weeks, I still have two more categories of photographs to upload. And once I finally get my scanner, updates should happen much more frequently. Any and all comments, questions or concerns about the anything on that site would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huggin.net/blog/2004/03/13/web-site-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
